A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst potential neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal web site in the north Dublin suburb, a scenario which has attracted nationwide focus following an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental problems, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Moments posting about René Collier as well as Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has progressed right into a highly publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design will work at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to create their family household. The situation has become emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever improvement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. According to the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their future neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted under preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing permission by developing a wall beyond the boundaries in their web page, leading to an encroachment on a Exclusive Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore parts are topic to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have Long lasting ecological repercussions, notably in the delicate coastal natural environment for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their preparing authorization, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper situation. Their authorized group has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The couple accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their see, an allegation which has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, in which views of the sea are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular endeavours because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments, a picture which includes since come to be emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times documented, describing how the two Adult men entered the water in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm drinking water to photograph the website turned one of the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into an area impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of arranging documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally pressured that their action is motivated by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely seeking to create a relatives house in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Specific Space of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out depending on Qualified information and authorized programs. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in local advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from very unique Skilled backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline as well as the symbolic character on the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the end result remains uncertain. The court docket should establish whether or not the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. Nevertheless the human component remains central: neighbours who must Are living together with each other lengthy once Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site the lawful charges are actually compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.